top of page
seamless-looping-animation-of-rotating-dna-strands-SBV-305438837-HD_AdobeExpress.gif
Chip Row 2.png

Reimagining CRISPR Editing 

Empowering scientists at the forefront of the gene

editing revolution with the insights needed to realize the full potential of CRISPR.

CRISPR QC was created to assist scientists in gene therapy and agtech companies to advance their science and bring products to market quicker by providing predictive insights and quality control metrics.

We recognize the limitations of older technologies in providing practical, effective, and timely information for optimizing and resolving issues in CRISPR editing.

To address this, we have developed our CRISPR Analytics Platform with the unique capabilities of CRISPR-Chip and through deliberate collaboration with CRISPR experts. 

CRISPR Editing Workflow -- Site.jpg
Chip Row 2.png

Case Study:
gRNA Selection

PROBLEM

Established In-silico models failed to accurately predict outcomes - costing the customer weeks of lost work.

gRNA selection graphic 1 .png

DATA

Comparative analysis of gRNA activity to identify highest-performing candidates; gRNA#39 demonstrated a clear separation from control

CONCLUSION

In this study, gRNA#39 showed the strongest performance and should be selected as the primary gRNA candidate

Screenshot 2022-11-15 143406.png

CUSTOMER OUTCOME

CRISPR QC identified the highest-performing gRNAs using our unique data, enabling them to achieve their desired gene edit.

grna graphic final.png
Chip Row 2.png

Case Study:
Environmental Comparison

PROBLEM

Customer noticed the gRNA selections as predicted by in-silico algorithms didn't lead to optimal editing outcomes. Sequencing data only told them that the edits didn't occur, but not why.  

Screen Shot 2022-12-01 at 11.49.25 PM.png

DATA

Performance of various gRNAs was ranked in relation to their activity in differing pH levels. These graphs compare RNP response of 8 different gRNAs at three different pH levels.

CONCLUSION

pH was determined to be a causal factor in their editing, something in-silico algorithms couldn't emulate.

Screen Shot 2023-01-09 at 11.34.36 AM.png

CUSTOMER OUTCOME

Customer was able to use our in-vitro data to select effective gRNAs. This greatly reduced the amount of cell work needed to produce a repeatable edit.

Screen Shot 2022-12-01 at 11.50.05 PM.png
Chip Row 2.png

Case Study:
Multiplex Editing

PROBLEM

Customer facing challenges getting desired multiplex editing result, and wanted to investigate the cause.

DATA

CRISPR-Chip analysis was used to characterize the binding kinetics of different gRNAs to Cas.

CONCLUSION

CRISPR QC determined how different gRNAs compete for Cas binding sites. In this study, gRNA #5 proved to be the fastest displacer.

Screen Shot 2023-01-09 at 11.36.40 AM.png

CUSTOMER OUTCOME

 Insight provided by CRISPR QC has given the customer new factors to optimize their multiplex editing.

Chip Row 2.png

Case Study:
Cas Vendor Comparison

PROBLEM

Customer wanted to vet Cas9 vendors ahead of setting up a CRISPR editing program.

DATA

CRISPR QC ran analysis on the activity between the chosen vendors and between batches from each.

CONCLUSION

Vendor 1 showed the most consistent performance and was recommended as the supplier for customer editing.

Screen Shot 2022-12-02 at 4.12.35 PM.png

CUSTOMER OUTCOME

Customer has been able to reduce variability in their outcomes by integrating regular Cas activity QC into their editing workflow.

Screen Shot 2022-12-02 at 4.14.16 PM.png

Ready to Get Started?

Get in touch with us by completing our contact form, and we

will get in contact with you as soon as possible.

8949 Kenamar Drive, Suite 101 San Diego, CA  92121, USA

bottom of page